Gender Differences in Work–Life Balance: Challenges and Coping Strategies Among University Faculty Members in Bangladesh
Keywords:
Work–Life Balance, Gender Differences, Coping StrategiesAbstract
This study investigates gender differences in work–life balance and coping strategies among university faculty members in Bangladesh, aiming to elucidate how gender shapes the experience and management of work–life integration in higher education. Using a cross-sectional survey design, data were collected from 248 faculty members across public and private universities. Findings indicate that male faculty report significantly higher work–life balance than female faculty, while female faculty demonstrate greater reliance on emotion-focused and avoidance-focused coping strategies. Structural equation modeling reveals that work–life balance is positively associated with problem-focused coping and partially mediates the relationship between gender and coping strategy adoption. No significant differences were observed between public and private institutions, though senior faculty reported higher perceived work–life balance, suggesting the protective effects of autonomy and experience. These results underscore the importance of gender-sensitive organizational policies, family-friendly practices, and professional development programs that enhance adaptive coping skills. The study contributes to cross-cultural work–life research by providing empirical evidence from the Global South and offers actionable insights for enhancing faculty wellbeing and institutional effectiveness.
References
Allen, T. D., French, K. A., Dumani, S., & Shockley, K. M. (2012). Meta‑analysis of work–family conflict and strain: Exploring gender differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 17–38.
Belt, V., & Richardson, J. (2005). Gender, coping strategies, and academic work. Higher Education Quarterly, 59(1), 48–67.
Byron, K. (2005). A meta‑analytic review of work–family conflict and its antecedents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67(2), 169–198.
Endler, N. S., & Parker, J. D. A. (1990). Multidimensional assessment of coping: A critical evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(5), 844–854.
Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76–88.
Grzywacz, J. G., & Carlson, D. S. (2007). Conceptualizing work–family balance: Implications for practice and research. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 9(4), 455–471.
Haar, J. M., Russo, M., Suñe, A., & Ollier‑Malaterre, A. (2014). Outcomes of work–life balance on job satisfaction, life satisfaction, and mental health: A study across seven cultures. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85(3), 361–373.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer.
Matud, M. P. (2004). Gender differences in stress and coping styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(7), 1401–1415.
Misra, J., Lundquist, J. H., Holmes, E., & Agiomavritis, S. (2012). The ivory ceiling of service work. Academe, 98(1), 22–25.
Poelmans, S., Greenhaus, J., & Caers, R. (2005). An international perspective on work and family: Current research and future directions. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Shockley, K. M., Shen, W., DeNunzio, M. M., Arvan, M. L., & Knudsen, E. A. (2017). Disentangling the relationship between gender and work–family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(12), 1601–1619.
Ten Brummelhuis, L. L., & Bakker, A. B. (2012). A resource perspective on the work–home interface: The work–home resources model. American Psychologist, 67(7), 545–556.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Society, Media and Technology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
